Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court ruled that when tax deducted at source (TDS) is not initially credited but the relevant certificate or Form 26AS is subsequently presented, the Assessing Officer is statutorily obligated u/s 155(14) to amend the assessment order accordingly. The provision does not mandate revising the original return. It caters to situations where TDS is reflected in Form 26AS after a time lag due to unforeseeable reasons. Once the updated Form 26AS is submitted, the Assessing Officer must acknowledge and amend the assessment. Denying the refund of TDS already deducted and reflected in Form 26AS, when the income was never taxable, is illegal and arbitrary. The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order u/s 264.
The High Court ruled that when tax deducted at source (TDS) is not initially credited but the relevant certificate or Form 26AS is subsequently presented, the Assessing Officer is statutorily obligated u/s 155(14) to amend the assessment order accordingly. The provision does not mandate revising the original return. It caters to situations where TDS is reflected in Form 26AS after a time lag due to unforeseeable reasons. Once the updated Form 26AS is submitted, the Assessing Officer must acknowledge and amend the assessment. Denying the refund of TDS already deducted and reflected in Form 26AS, when the income was never taxable, is illegal and arbitrary. The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order u/s 264.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
