Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The Tribunal held that the amount representing payment to a contractor, M/s Growfast Realtors (P) Ltd, was duly proved and the addition as unexplained credits was unsustainable. Regarding payment to M/s Sarda Vanijya (P) Ltd, supported by an accountant's certificate and TDS deduction, the Tribunal accepted it as a business payment and deleted the addition as unexplained credits. For small trading liabilities where the assessee could not furnish documents for two parties, the Tribunal favored the assessee based on preponderance of probabilities and deleted the addition. For trading liabilities related to Kripa Infrastructure and Swastik Engineering, considering the overall facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 50% of the AO's addition. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The Tribunal held that the amount representing payment to a contractor, M/s Growfast Realtors (P) Ltd, was duly proved and the addition as unexplained credits was unsustainable. Regarding payment to M/s Sarda Vanijya (P) Ltd, supported by an accountant's certificate and TDS deduction, the Tribunal accepted it as a business payment and deleted the addition as unexplained credits. For small trading liabilities where the assessee could not furnish documents for two parties, the Tribunal favored the assessee based on preponderance of probabilities and deleted the addition. For trading liabilities related to Kripa Infrastructure and Swastik Engineering, considering the overall facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 50% of the AO's addition. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
