Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The Tribunal held that the amount representing payment to a contractor, M/s Growfast Realtors (P) Ltd, was duly proved and the addition as unexplained credits was unsustainable. Regarding payment to M/s Sarda Vanijya (P) Ltd, supported by an accountant's certificate and TDS deduction, the Tribunal accepted it as a business payment and deleted the addition as unexplained credits. For small trading liabilities where the assessee could not furnish documents for two parties, the Tribunal favored the assessee based on preponderance of probabilities and deleted the addition. For trading liabilities related to Kripa Infrastructure and Swastik Engineering, considering the overall facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 50% of the AO's addition. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The Tribunal held that the amount representing payment to a contractor, M/s Growfast Realtors (P) Ltd, was duly proved and the addition as unexplained credits was unsustainable. Regarding payment to M/s Sarda Vanijya (P) Ltd, supported by an accountant's certificate and TDS deduction, the Tribunal accepted it as a business payment and deleted the addition as unexplained credits. For small trading liabilities where the assessee could not furnish documents for two parties, the Tribunal favored the assessee based on preponderance of probabilities and deleted the addition. For trading liabilities related to Kripa Infrastructure and Swastik Engineering, considering the overall facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 50% of the AO's addition. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
