Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified. Impugned order quashed, directing authorities to release detained goods and vehicle within two weeks to petitioner. Petition allowed.
High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified. Impugned order quashed, directing authorities to release detained goods and vehicle within two weeks to petitioner. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.