Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified. Impugned order quashed, directing authorities to release detained goods and vehicle within two weeks to petitioner. Petition allowed.
High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified. Impugned order quashed, directing authorities to release detained goods and vehicle within two weeks to petitioner. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.