Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.