Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.