Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.