Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Principles of natural justice violated due to non-issuance of notice regarding discrepancies as mandated by Rule 101(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Discrepancies existed between audit report and demands raised. Petitioner asserted providing all requested documents, while respondents issued reminders for document submission. Petitioner sought direction for adjudicating authority to consider responses to show cause notices without influence from audit memo or report observations. Court directed adjudicating authority to independently examine petitioner's reply to impugned show cause notice and take decision regarding proposed demand, without implicitly relying on audit memo or report observations. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.