Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.