Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.