Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.