Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Unreasoned orders passed u/s 73 of the Central/Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 violated principles of natural justice. The impugned orders were set aside, and matters remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The authority was directed not to pass adverse orders without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioners. All rights and contentions of petitioners were reserved, allowing them to raise issues including those raised in the present petitions. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.