Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.