Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.