Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by a company in liquidation process against income tax proceedings due to the moratorium imposed u/s 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The moratorium prohibits continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor during the insolvency resolution process. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments which held that even arbitration proceedings cannot continue after the moratorium, and appeals by the company cannot be sustained without permission from the National Company Law Tribunal or proper authorization by the Insolvency Resolution Professional. The appeals were dismissed with liberty to refile after the moratorium period, if desired, by making the representative of the Committee of Creditors a party.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by a company in liquidation process against income tax proceedings due to the moratorium imposed u/s 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The moratorium prohibits continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor during the insolvency resolution process. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court and High Court judgments which held that even arbitration proceedings cannot continue after the moratorium, and appeals by the company cannot be sustained without permission from the National Company Law Tribunal or proper authorization by the Insolvency Resolution Professional. The appeals were dismissed with liberty to refile after the moratorium period, if desired, by making the representative of the Committee of Creditors a party.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
