Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Goods imported and warehoused in Kandla Special Economic Zone were cleared into Domestic Tariff Area. The department enhanced the value based on NIDB data, leading to confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty. However, the NIDB data was from 2017, while clearance occurred in 2018, rendering its application unjustified. No evidence of undervaluation, such as invoice manipulation or consideration flow-back, was presented. The declared invoice value was accepted in the absence of contrary material. As no mala fide intention was established, imposition of fine and penalty was incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Goods imported and warehoused in Kandla Special Economic Zone were cleared into Domestic Tariff Area. The department enhanced the value based on NIDB data, leading to confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty. However, the NIDB data was from 2017, while clearance occurred in 2018, rendering its application unjustified. No evidence of undervaluation, such as invoice manipulation or consideration flow-back, was presented. The declared invoice value was accepted in the absence of contrary material. As no mala fide intention was established, imposition of fine and penalty was incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.