Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents without actual exports. Adjudicating Authority imposed penalties of Rs.2 lakhs for Section 8(1) contravention and Rs.3 lakhs for Section 9(1)(f)(i) contravention. Show Cause Notice issued in 2002, over 22 years ago. Appellant deposited Rs.2 lakhs against total penalty of Rs.5 lakhs. Considering case peculiarities and counsel leaving penalty reduction open, Appellate Tribunal reduced total penalty to Rs.2 lakhs, Rs.1 lakh each for Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) contraventions. Deposited amount treated as satisfying reduced penalty, no further deposit required.
Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents without actual exports. Adjudicating Authority imposed penalties of Rs.2 lakhs for Section 8(1) contravention and Rs.3 lakhs for Section 9(1)(f)(i) contravention. Show Cause Notice issued in 2002, over 22 years ago. Appellant deposited Rs.2 lakhs against total penalty of Rs.5 lakhs. Considering case peculiarities and counsel leaving penalty reduction open, Appellate Tribunal reduced total penalty to Rs.2 lakhs, Rs.1 lakh each for Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) contraventions. Deposited amount treated as satisfying reduced penalty, no further deposit required.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
