Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court dismissed the petitioner's application for regular bail in a money laundering case. The key points are: The predicate offence involved Veerendra Kumar Ram giving cash to Mukesh Mittal, who used entry providers like the petitioner to make entries in bank accounts and route funds. The petitioner is alleged to be the mastermind behind using bank accounts for laundering/routing funds, making him a key person in the nexus providing entries for commission, thus involved in the money laundering offence. Despite the petitioner's long jail time, the court considered the serious nature of the socio-economic offence with deep-rooted conspiracies affecting societal moral fibre. The investigating agency was expediting the trial. With direct allegations of the petitioner's involvement in proceeds of crime, the court denied bail.
The court dismissed the petitioner's application for regular bail in a money laundering case. The key points are: The predicate offence involved Veerendra Kumar Ram giving cash to Mukesh Mittal, who used entry providers like the petitioner to make entries in bank accounts and route funds. The petitioner is alleged to be the mastermind behind using bank accounts for laundering/routing funds, making him a key person in the nexus providing entries for commission, thus involved in the money laundering offence. Despite the petitioner's long jail time, the court considered the serious nature of the socio-economic offence with deep-rooted conspiracies affecting societal moral fibre. The investigating agency was expediting the trial. With direct allegations of the petitioner's involvement in proceeds of crime, the court denied bail.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.