Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Money laundering case involving proceeds of crime from scheduled offence of conspiracy to siphon crores of rupees deposited by innocent bank depositors. Key points: Offence u/s 3 of PMLA requires illegal gain of property from a scheduled offence, which is a prerequisite for prosecution. Prosecution cannot be initiated on notional basis or assumption of scheduled offence without it being registered with police or pending inquiry/trial. If accused is discharged/acquitted of scheduled offence or case quashed, no money laundering offence can be made out. Subsequent FIR cannot be subsumed into existing ECIR without satisfying requirements. ECIR based on scheduled offence of cheating under IPC. Well-settled that money laundering offence depends on illegal property from scheduled offence. Prosecution not permissible on assumption alone. Petitions seeking relief dismissed as grievances undeserving.
Money laundering case involving proceeds of crime from scheduled offence of conspiracy to siphon crores of rupees deposited by innocent bank depositors. Key points: Offence u/s 3 of PMLA requires illegal gain of property from a scheduled offence, which is a prerequisite for prosecution. Prosecution cannot be initiated on notional basis or assumption of scheduled offence without it being registered with police or pending inquiry/trial. If accused is discharged/acquitted of scheduled offence or case quashed, no money laundering offence can be made out. Subsequent FIR cannot be subsumed into existing ECIR without satisfying requirements. ECIR based on scheduled offence of cheating under IPC. Well-settled that money laundering offence depends on illegal property from scheduled offence. Prosecution not permissible on assumption alone. Petitions seeking relief dismissed as grievances undeserving.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
