Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ruling addresses the issue of proportionate reversal/recovery of CENVAT Credit for unsold flats available on the day of issuance of completion/occupancy certificate to the builder. The key points are: Credit eligibility is to be examined on the date of receipt of input services, not governed by later developments like property conversion into immovable property after receiving completion certificate, as per the Alembic Ltd. case. Sale of immovable property being excluded from the definition of service u/s 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, and including it as an exempted service through Explanation-3 of Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, cannot be considered a validly legislated rule due to Section 38A of the Central Excise Act and Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The order of the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Appeals Thane), Mumbai is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
The ruling addresses the issue of proportionate reversal/recovery of CENVAT Credit for unsold flats available on the day of issuance of completion/occupancy certificate to the builder. The key points are: Credit eligibility is to be examined on the date of receipt of input services, not governed by later developments like property conversion into immovable property after receiving completion certificate, as per the Alembic Ltd. case. Sale of immovable property being excluded from the definition of service u/s 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, and including it as an exempted service through Explanation-3 of Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, cannot be considered a validly legislated rule due to Section 38A of the Central Excise Act and Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The order of the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Appeals Thane), Mumbai is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.