Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The High Court held that the Assessing Officer could not reopen the assessment u/s 147 as the basic precondition of having "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment was not satisfied. Despite information from the search action u/s 132, when the petitioner was assessed u/s 115JB and had paid tax at 7.5%, adding the alleged escaped income would result in an amount less than the tax already paid. Therefore, no income had actually escaped assessment. Consequently, the impugned notices u/s 148 and subsequent proceedings were unsustainable, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
The High Court held that the Assessing Officer could not reopen the assessment u/s 147 as the basic precondition of having "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment was not satisfied. Despite information from the search action u/s 132, when the petitioner was assessed u/s 115JB and had paid tax at 7.5%, adding the alleged escaped income would result in an amount less than the tax already paid. Therefore, no income had actually escaped assessment. Consequently, the impugned notices u/s 148 and subsequent proceedings were unsustainable, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
