Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
The petitioner's claim for refund of unutilized credit on account of payment of Service Tax, Education Cess (EC), Secondary and Higher Education Cess (SHEC), and Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC) under the GST regime was rejected. The court held that EC, SHEC, and KKC can only be utilized for payment of such cess and not for any other purposes under the CENVAT Credit Rules. There is no cross-utilization of EC, SHEC, and KKC against tax payable on account of Service Tax. The judgment of the Madras High Court in Sutherland Global Services case clarified that there cannot be any transitioning of cess paid as EC, SHEC, and KKC u/s 140 of the CGST Act. The petitioner's claim for refund u/s 54 of the CGST Act was also rejected, as refund can only be claimed for zero-rated supplies or inverted duty structure, which does not apply in this case. The court dismissed the petition, rejecting the petitioner's contentions and the contrary views taken by various Tribunals as not in accordance with statutory provisions.
The petitioner's claim for refund of unutilized credit on account of payment of Service Tax, Education Cess (EC), Secondary and Higher Education Cess (SHEC), and Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC) under the GST regime was rejected. The court held that EC, SHEC, and KKC can only be utilized for payment of such cess and not for any other purposes under the CENVAT Credit Rules. There is no cross-utilization of EC, SHEC, and KKC against tax payable on account of Service Tax. The judgment of the Madras High Court in Sutherland Global Services case clarified that there cannot be any transitioning of cess paid as EC, SHEC, and KKC u/s 140 of the CGST Act. The petitioner's claim for refund u/s 54 of the CGST Act was also rejected, as refund can only be claimed for zero-rated supplies or inverted duty structure, which does not apply in this case. The court dismissed the petition, rejecting the petitioner's contentions and the contrary views taken by various Tribunals as not in accordance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
