Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The assessee's contribution to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) is a revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. This issue is settled, as the Bombay High Court in Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case accepted that CAF contribution is revenue expenditure. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's Special Leave Petition against Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case, upholding the High Court's decision. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises regarding the allowability of CAF contribution as a revenue expense.
The assessee's contribution to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) is a revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. This issue is settled, as the Bombay High Court in Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case accepted that CAF contribution is revenue expenditure. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's Special Leave Petition against Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case, upholding the High Court's decision. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises regarding the allowability of CAF contribution as a revenue expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
