Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The assessee's contribution to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) is a revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. This issue is settled, as the Bombay High Court in Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case accepted that CAF contribution is revenue expenditure. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's Special Leave Petition against Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case, upholding the High Court's decision. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises regarding the allowability of CAF contribution as a revenue expense.
The assessee's contribution to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) is a revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. This issue is settled, as the Bombay High Court in Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case accepted that CAF contribution is revenue expenditure. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's Special Leave Petition against Dr. Prafulla R. Hede's case, upholding the High Court's decision. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises regarding the allowability of CAF contribution as a revenue expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
