Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.