Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
