Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
