Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Classification of imported goods, specifically Quick Lime, under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the levy of interest. The key points are: Quick Lime is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 2522 1000, not CTH 2825, as decided by the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in a previous case. Regarding the levy of interest, the amounts paid by the appellant during the investigation stage are required to be refunded along with interest at 12% rate, as per the cited case laws of the Delhi and Allahabad Benches of the CESTAT. The appeal is disposed off based on these findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
