Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Central Excise Act interpretation regarding use of oxygen in sulphuric acid manufacturing. Tribunal upheld that oxygen produced by respondent was not used in sulphuric acid manufacturing, satisfying Notification 67/95 conditions. Supreme Court ruling in Hindustan Zinc case followed. Tribunal referred to Environment Protection Rules mandating sulphur dioxide emission prevention by utilizing waste gases in sulphuric acid production. Findings based on evidence, not perverse. High Court dismissed appeal, affirming Tribunal's decision.
Central Excise Act interpretation regarding use of oxygen in sulphuric acid manufacturing. Tribunal upheld that oxygen produced by respondent was not used in sulphuric acid manufacturing, satisfying Notification 67/95 conditions. Supreme Court ruling in Hindustan Zinc case followed. Tribunal referred to Environment Protection Rules mandating sulphur dioxide emission prevention by utilizing waste gases in sulphuric acid production. Findings based on evidence, not perverse. High Court dismissed appeal, affirming Tribunal's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.