Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Central Excise Act interpretation regarding use of oxygen in sulphuric acid manufacturing. Tribunal upheld that oxygen produced by respondent was not used in sulphuric acid manufacturing, satisfying Notification 67/95 conditions. Supreme Court ruling in Hindustan Zinc case followed. Tribunal referred to Environment Protection Rules mandating sulphur dioxide emission prevention by utilizing waste gases in sulphuric acid production. Findings based on evidence, not perverse. High Court dismissed appeal, affirming Tribunal's decision.
Central Excise Act interpretation regarding use of oxygen in sulphuric acid manufacturing. Tribunal upheld that oxygen produced by respondent was not used in sulphuric acid manufacturing, satisfying Notification 67/95 conditions. Supreme Court ruling in Hindustan Zinc case followed. Tribunal referred to Environment Protection Rules mandating sulphur dioxide emission prevention by utilizing waste gases in sulphuric acid production. Findings based on evidence, not perverse. High Court dismissed appeal, affirming Tribunal's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
