Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. It states that if exporters initially imported inputs without paying IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later paid the dues along with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The Explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively deems the exemption notification benefits as not availed if IGST and cess were paid on imported inputs. Therefore, refund of IGST on exports in such cases can be regularized.
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017, where exporters had imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess. It states that if exporters initially imported inputs without paying IGST and cess by availing exemption notifications, but later paid the dues along with interest and got the Bill of Entry reassessed, the IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The Explanation inserted in rule 96(10) retrospectively deems the exemption notification benefits as not availed if IGST and cess were paid on imported inputs. Therefore, refund of IGST on exports in such cases can be regularized.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
