Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The petitioner's appeal against cancellation of GST registration was filed beyond the condonation period prescribed u/s 107(4) of the GST Act. The petitioner had not filed GSTR returns for over six months. In an identical batch of matters, the Madras High Court allowed writ petitions subject to fulfilling certain conditions. Following this precedent, the Court allowed the present writ petition on conditions agreed upon by the petitioner's counsel and not objected to by the respondents' counsel.
The petitioner's appeal against cancellation of GST registration was filed beyond the condonation period prescribed u/s 107(4) of the GST Act. The petitioner had not filed GSTR returns for over six months. In an identical batch of matters, the Madras High Court allowed writ petitions subject to fulfilling certain conditions. Following this precedent, the Court allowed the present writ petition on conditions agreed upon by the petitioner's counsel and not objected to by the respondents' counsel.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.