Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The petitioner's appeal against cancellation of GST registration was filed beyond the condonation period prescribed u/s 107(4) of the GST Act. The petitioner had not filed GSTR returns for over six months. In an identical batch of matters, the Madras High Court allowed writ petitions subject to fulfilling certain conditions. Following this precedent, the Court allowed the present writ petition on conditions agreed upon by the petitioner's counsel and not objected to by the respondents' counsel.
The petitioner's appeal against cancellation of GST registration was filed beyond the condonation period prescribed u/s 107(4) of the GST Act. The petitioner had not filed GSTR returns for over six months. In an identical batch of matters, the Madras High Court allowed writ petitions subject to fulfilling certain conditions. Following this precedent, the Court allowed the present writ petition on conditions agreed upon by the petitioner's counsel and not objected to by the respondents' counsel.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.