Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return indicating tax liability for the year 2011-12, but did not deposit the tax liability initially, which was later deposited with interest u/s 240(A) of the Income Tax Act. No proceedings pending against petitioner regarding tax recovery or penalty. Willful demand of tax payment was the subject matter in Gopal Ji Shaw case, considered by the court. No penalty provision against petitioner, presuming no concealment, hence quashing of prosecution u/s 276(C)(1) automatic. Penalty proceedings and prosecution can proceed simultaneously, but in this case, no penalty proceedings, so petitioner's case allowed under Article 226 of the Constitution based on Pralay Pal case. Entire criminal proceedings, including cognizance order dated 02.11.2017 for offences u/ss 276(C)(2) and 277 against petitioner in the Special Judge's court, quashed.
Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return indicating tax liability for the year 2011-12, but did not deposit the tax liability initially, which was later deposited with interest u/s 240(A) of the Income Tax Act. No proceedings pending against petitioner regarding tax recovery or penalty. Willful demand of tax payment was the subject matter in Gopal Ji Shaw case, considered by the court. No penalty provision against petitioner, presuming no concealment, hence quashing of prosecution u/s 276(C)(1) automatic. Penalty proceedings and prosecution can proceed simultaneously, but in this case, no penalty proceedings, so petitioner's case allowed under Article 226 of the Constitution based on Pralay Pal case. Entire criminal proceedings, including cognizance order dated 02.11.2017 for offences u/ss 276(C)(2) and 277 against petitioner in the Special Judge's court, quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.