Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return indicating tax liability for the year 2011-12, but did not deposit the tax liability initially, which was later deposited with interest u/s 240(A) of the Income Tax Act. No proceedings pending against petitioner regarding tax recovery or penalty. Willful demand of tax payment was the subject matter in Gopal Ji Shaw case, considered by the court. No penalty provision against petitioner, presuming no concealment, hence quashing of prosecution u/s 276(C)(1) automatic. Penalty proceedings and prosecution can proceed simultaneously, but in this case, no penalty proceedings, so petitioner's case allowed under Article 226 of the Constitution based on Pralay Pal case. Entire criminal proceedings, including cognizance order dated 02.11.2017 for offences u/ss 276(C)(2) and 277 against petitioner in the Special Judge's court, quashed.
Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return indicating tax liability for the year 2011-12, but did not deposit the tax liability initially, which was later deposited with interest u/s 240(A) of the Income Tax Act. No proceedings pending against petitioner regarding tax recovery or penalty. Willful demand of tax payment was the subject matter in Gopal Ji Shaw case, considered by the court. No penalty provision against petitioner, presuming no concealment, hence quashing of prosecution u/s 276(C)(1) automatic. Penalty proceedings and prosecution can proceed simultaneously, but in this case, no penalty proceedings, so petitioner's case allowed under Article 226 of the Constitution based on Pralay Pal case. Entire criminal proceedings, including cognizance order dated 02.11.2017 for offences u/ss 276(C)(2) and 277 against petitioner in the Special Judge's court, quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.