Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Notification 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 prescribed filing refund claim for service tax paid on input services used for export of goods within one year from date of export. Appellants filed refund claims for service tax paid on freight, banking and financial services for exports made during April 2013 to January 2014 beyond one year time limit. Such delayed refund claims are barred by limitation and not admissible despite being substantively eligible. No grounds to interfere with impugned order rejecting delayed refund claims. Appeal dismissed.
Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Notification 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 prescribed filing refund claim for service tax paid on input services used for export of goods within one year from date of export. Appellants filed refund claims for service tax paid on freight, banking and financial services for exports made during April 2013 to January 2014 beyond one year time limit. Such delayed refund claims are barred by limitation and not admissible despite being substantively eligible. No grounds to interfere with impugned order rejecting delayed refund claims. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.