Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Notification 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 prescribed filing refund claim for service tax paid on input services used for export of goods within one year from date of export. Appellants filed refund claims for service tax paid on freight, banking and financial services for exports made during April 2013 to January 2014 beyond one year time limit. Such delayed refund claims are barred by limitation and not admissible despite being substantively eligible. No grounds to interfere with impugned order rejecting delayed refund claims. Appeal dismissed.
Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act, 1994. Notification 41/2012-ST dated 29.06.2012 prescribed filing refund claim for service tax paid on input services used for export of goods within one year from date of export. Appellants filed refund claims for service tax paid on freight, banking and financial services for exports made during April 2013 to January 2014 beyond one year time limit. Such delayed refund claims are barred by limitation and not admissible despite being substantively eligible. No grounds to interfere with impugned order rejecting delayed refund claims. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.