Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The key points covered in the summary are: Disallowance of deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for debts written off, as the assessee did not create a provision in the books, which is a mandatory requirement. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to examine afresh the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for bad debts actually written off after providing an opportunity. Regarding addition towards profit on sale of investments, the matter was set aside to the Assessing Officer to decide afresh after providing an opportunity to the assessee to produce documentary evidence. On the issue of depreciation claimed on investments shown as current assets, it was held that no depreciation is allowable on investments treated as current assets. The contention that investments are non-SLR and shown as current assets was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify, in light of CBDT Circular No. 665, whether investments fall under stock-in-trade to be valued at lower of cost or market rate as per accounting principles.
The key points covered in the summary are: Disallowance of deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for debts written off, as the assessee did not create a provision in the books, which is a mandatory requirement. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to examine afresh the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) for bad debts actually written off after providing an opportunity. Regarding addition towards profit on sale of investments, the matter was set aside to the Assessing Officer to decide afresh after providing an opportunity to the assessee to produce documentary evidence. On the issue of depreciation claimed on investments shown as current assets, it was held that no depreciation is allowable on investments treated as current assets. The contention that investments are non-SLR and shown as current assets was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify, in light of CBDT Circular No. 665, whether investments fall under stock-in-trade to be valued at lower of cost or market rate as per accounting principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.