Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant engaged in multi-level sales promotion activities, selling vouchers for gifts, holidays and airline tickets to corporate clients. Classified services under 'Tour Operator' and availed abatement, but demand raised under 'Business Auxiliary Service'. Held appellant directly provided services to customers without corporate intervention, rightly classified under 'Tour Operator' and availed abatement. Extended period invoked solely based on audit without evidence of intent to evade tax, appellant filing returns declaring abatement, hence not sustainable. No demand sustainable, so no interest or penalty payable. Impugned order set aside by Appellate Tribunal.
Appellant engaged in multi-level sales promotion activities, selling vouchers for gifts, holidays and airline tickets to corporate clients. Classified services under 'Tour Operator' and availed abatement, but demand raised under 'Business Auxiliary Service'. Held appellant directly provided services to customers without corporate intervention, rightly classified under 'Tour Operator' and availed abatement. Extended period invoked solely based on audit without evidence of intent to evade tax, appellant filing returns declaring abatement, hence not sustainable. No demand sustainable, so no interest or penalty payable. Impugned order set aside by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.