Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
Appellant was found guilty of contravening Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) and Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) read with Section 64 of FERA for over-invoicing imported books and unauthorised foreign exchange remittances through proprietorship firms. Although not the mastermind, Appellant had knowledge of the fraudulent scheme and allowed the main accused to use proprietorship names for imports. Based on recorded statements and available records, Appellate Tribunal established Appellant's involvement in the contravention. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2 Lakhs, which was already pre-deposited. The blocked amount of Rs. 60,859.52 in Appellant's firm's account was directed to be released along with interest.
Appellant was found guilty of contravening Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) and Sections 8(3) read with 8(4) read with Section 64 of FERA for over-invoicing imported books and unauthorised foreign exchange remittances through proprietorship firms. Although not the mastermind, Appellant had knowledge of the fraudulent scheme and allowed the main accused to use proprietorship names for imports. Based on recorded statements and available records, Appellate Tribunal established Appellant's involvement in the contravention. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 2 Lakhs, which was already pre-deposited. The blocked amount of Rs. 60,859.52 in Appellant's firm's account was directed to be released along with interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
