Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustment concerning comparability selection and attribution of profits between the respondent assessee and foreign Associated Enterprise. TPO rejected internal comparables due to size of transactions with AEs. ITAT held size alone cannot be grounds for rejecting comparables, unless transactions are contrived or abnormal. Internal TNMM comparing AE and non-AE profitability justified. ALP adjustment deleted. Identification of comparables key to transfer pricing analysis. Choice of method depends on availability of comparables and comparability adjustments. As comparability increases, potential inaccuracies decrease. Consistent with Sony Ericsson case. Attribution of profits between assessee and AE - appeals dismissed following principle of consistency.
Transfer pricing adjustment concerning comparability selection and attribution of profits between the respondent assessee and foreign Associated Enterprise. TPO rejected internal comparables due to size of transactions with AEs. ITAT held size alone cannot be grounds for rejecting comparables, unless transactions are contrived or abnormal. Internal TNMM comparing AE and non-AE profitability justified. ALP adjustment deleted. Identification of comparables key to transfer pricing analysis. Choice of method depends on availability of comparables and comparability adjustments. As comparability increases, potential inaccuracies decrease. Consistent with Sony Ericsson case. Attribution of profits between assessee and AE - appeals dismissed following principle of consistency.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.