Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transfer pricing adjustment concerning comparability selection and attribution of profits between the respondent assessee and foreign Associated Enterprise. TPO rejected internal comparables due to size of transactions with AEs. ITAT held size alone cannot be grounds for rejecting comparables, unless transactions are contrived or abnormal. Internal TNMM comparing AE and non-AE profitability justified. ALP adjustment deleted. Identification of comparables key to transfer pricing analysis. Choice of method depends on availability of comparables and comparability adjustments. As comparability increases, potential inaccuracies decrease. Consistent with Sony Ericsson case. Attribution of profits between assessee and AE - appeals dismissed following principle of consistency.
Transfer pricing adjustment concerning comparability selection and attribution of profits between the respondent assessee and foreign Associated Enterprise. TPO rejected internal comparables due to size of transactions with AEs. ITAT held size alone cannot be grounds for rejecting comparables, unless transactions are contrived or abnormal. Internal TNMM comparing AE and non-AE profitability justified. ALP adjustment deleted. Identification of comparables key to transfer pricing analysis. Choice of method depends on availability of comparables and comparability adjustments. As comparability increases, potential inaccuracies decrease. Consistent with Sony Ericsson case. Attribution of profits between assessee and AE - appeals dismissed following principle of consistency.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
