Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Benami transaction - Attachment of funds towards chit funds in appellants' name and another maturity value. Reliance on sworn statement u/s 132(4) of Income Tax Act permissible even in proceedings under 1988 Act, not just for prosecution. Revenue proceedings differ from criminal proceedings, no necessity to follow CrPC or Evidence Act. Initiating Officer considered issues raised before Adjudicating Authority. Appellant's argument of chit funds from disclosed sources rejected, admission of operation at instance of third party. Appellant failed to prove income from poultry or agriculture, VEO certificate based on information, not revenue records. Benami transaction rightly held. Appellant's income above taxable limit, no ITR filed. Each aspect considered by Adjudicating Authority, lame excuses rejected. No error found, appeals dismissed.
Benami transaction - Attachment of funds towards chit funds in appellants' name and another maturity value. Reliance on sworn statement u/s 132(4) of Income Tax Act permissible even in proceedings under 1988 Act, not just for prosecution. Revenue proceedings differ from criminal proceedings, no necessity to follow CrPC or Evidence Act. Initiating Officer considered issues raised before Adjudicating Authority. Appellant's argument of chit funds from disclosed sources rejected, admission of operation at instance of third party. Appellant failed to prove income from poultry or agriculture, VEO certificate based on information, not revenue records. Benami transaction rightly held. Appellant's income above taxable limit, no ITR filed. Each aspect considered by Adjudicating Authority, lame excuses rejected. No error found, appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
