Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The court observed that as per the recent Supreme Court decision in SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Krish Spinning, the arbitral tribunal is the preferred first authority to determine questions of arbitrability and jurisdiction, and courts at the referral stage should not delve into contested issues involving complex facts. The respondents raised objections but did not deny the existence of the arbitration agreement invoked by the petitioner, satisfying the requirement of prima facie existence u/s 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Once constituted, the tribunal can consider respondents' objections before adjudicating petitioner's claims. Justice Mohit S. Shah, former Chief Justice of Bombay High Court, was appointed as the sole arbitrator, with fees and modalities to be fixed in consultation with parties. The petition was allowed.
The court observed that as per the recent Supreme Court decision in SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Krish Spinning, the arbitral tribunal is the preferred first authority to determine questions of arbitrability and jurisdiction, and courts at the referral stage should not delve into contested issues involving complex facts. The respondents raised objections but did not deny the existence of the arbitration agreement invoked by the petitioner, satisfying the requirement of prima facie existence u/s 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. Once constituted, the tribunal can consider respondents' objections before adjudicating petitioner's claims. Justice Mohit S. Shah, former Chief Justice of Bombay High Court, was appointed as the sole arbitrator, with fees and modalities to be fixed in consultation with parties. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.