Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994 not applicable. Applicability of Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. Refund application filed on 23.11.2020 pursuant to Gujarat High Court decision dated 06.09.2019. Supreme Court dismissed revenue's appeal on 01.09.2023, holding service tax levy not maintainable. Refund claim filed before 31.08.2024, within one year from relevant date. Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 states only Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 to be considered for refund processing. Rejection of refund claim unsustainable. Appellant entitled to refund of service tax paid on ocean freight during disputed period. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994 not applicable. Applicability of Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. Refund application filed on 23.11.2020 pursuant to Gujarat High Court decision dated 06.09.2019. Supreme Court dismissed revenue's appeal on 01.09.2023, holding service tax levy not maintainable. Refund claim filed before 31.08.2024, within one year from relevant date. Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 states only Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 to be considered for refund processing. Rejection of refund claim unsustainable. Appellant entitled to refund of service tax paid on ocean freight during disputed period. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
