Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the assessing officer failed to issue a notice before reaching an adverse conclusion regarding the certificate not mentioning the Capital Gains Account, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned assessment order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the assessing officer to pass appropriate orders on merits within six months, adhering to due process and considering the bank certificate issued to the assessee. The court emphasized the necessity of providing an opportunity to the assessee before arriving at an adverse finding, upholding procedural fairness in tax assessments.
The High Court held that the assessing officer failed to issue a notice before reaching an adverse conclusion regarding the certificate not mentioning the Capital Gains Account, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned assessment order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the assessing officer to pass appropriate orders on merits within six months, adhering to due process and considering the bank certificate issued to the assessee. The court emphasized the necessity of providing an opportunity to the assessee before arriving at an adverse finding, upholding procedural fairness in tax assessments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.