Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
In a case concerning the notice issued u/s 74 of the OGST Act for testing fly ash bricks, the High Court held that since the components of fly ash bricks are under challenge, it is not inclined to interfere with the notice at this stage. The petitioner was advised to raise objections and provide a comprehensive reply to the show cause notice regarding verification of fly ash bricks and utilization of raw materials. The Court stated that if the petitioner responds accordingly, the authority can take necessary steps as per law. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposing of the writ petition.
In a case concerning the notice issued u/s 74 of the OGST Act for testing fly ash bricks, the High Court held that since the components of fly ash bricks are under challenge, it is not inclined to interfere with the notice at this stage. The petitioner was advised to raise objections and provide a comprehensive reply to the show cause notice regarding verification of fly ash bricks and utilization of raw materials. The Court stated that if the petitioner responds accordingly, the authority can take necessary steps as per law. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposing of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.