Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2881 to 2900 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity for personal hearing, amounting to a violation of principles of natural justice. The Court held that the impugned order was passed without fixing any date or issuing further notice for another hearing date, rendering it an ex parte order. Relying on a previous judgment, the Court remitted the matter to the Deputy Commissioner to pass a fresh order after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity for personal hearing, amounting to a violation of principles of natural justice. The Court held that the impugned order was passed without fixing any date or issuing further notice for another hearing date, rendering it an ex parte order. Relying on a previous judgment, the Court remitted the matter to the Deputy Commissioner to pass a fresh order after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
