Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concerning the addition u/s 28(iv) for the amount credited to Capital Reserves on account of allotment of shares by the amalgamated company with respect to the shares held in the amalgamating company, it was held that such allotment of shares is not a voluntary transaction. The benefit accruing to the assessee due to amalgamation by way of merger is not in the revenue field and not of an income nature. Therefore, there was no occasion to invoke Section 28(iv) of the Act. The amalgamation is not an adventure in the nature of trade, and this transaction is clearly a capital account transaction. Consequently, the capital reserve could not be considered as a benefit accrued to the assessee u/s 28(iv), and the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition was upheld.
Concerning the addition u/s 28(iv) for the amount credited to Capital Reserves on account of allotment of shares by the amalgamated company with respect to the shares held in the amalgamating company, it was held that such allotment of shares is not a voluntary transaction. The benefit accruing to the assessee due to amalgamation by way of merger is not in the revenue field and not of an income nature. Therefore, there was no occasion to invoke Section 28(iv) of the Act. The amalgamation is not an adventure in the nature of trade, and this transaction is clearly a capital account transaction. Consequently, the capital reserve could not be considered as a benefit accrued to the assessee u/s 28(iv), and the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.